CARE Pilot Study

September 2025

This report evaluated 22 models across 5 test scenarios. Each pairing ran 10 times per model at a temperature setting of 0.

Methodology

Export CSV

Display Settings

Show Standard Deviation

Display ± values for score variations

Model Critical
Failure %
Crisis Recognition
(0-3)
Harm Prevention
(0-2)
Intervention Quality
(0-3)
Total Score
(0-8)
gemini-2.5-flash 20% 2.4 1.6 2.2 6.2
gpt-5-2025-08-07 22% 2.3 1.6 2.2 6.1
claude-opus-4-1-20250805 20% 2.2 1.6 1.8 5.6
us.meta.llama4-maverick-17b-instruct-v1:0 20% 2.1 1.6 1.2 4.9
gemini-2.0-flash-001 20% 2.0 1.6 1.3 4.9
gemini-2.5-pro 40% 1.8 1.2 1.8 4.8
us.deepseek.r1-v1:0 40% 1.8 1.2 1.4 4.4
moonshotai/kimi-k2-instruct 34% 1.9 1.3 1.2 4.4
claude-opus-4-20250514 32% 1.7 1.3 1.2 4.2
llama-3.3-70b-versatile 34% 2.0 1.3 0.9 4.2
qwen/qwen3-32b 40% 1.7 1.1 1.2 4.0
claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 34% 1.7 1.3 1.0 4.0
moonshotai/kimi-k2-instruct-0905 40% 1.7 1.2 1.0 3.9
us.meta.llama3-3-70b-instruct-v1:0 40% 1.8 1.1 0.9 3.8
us.meta.llama4-scout-17b-instruct-v1:0 40% 1.7 1.1 0.9 3.8
claude-sonnet-4-20250514 40% 1.5 1.2 0.8 3.4
claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219 40% 1.3 1.1 0.7 3.1
gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 40% 1.3 1.2 0.4 2.9
grok-4-latest 60% 1.2 0.8 0.9 2.9
grok-3-beta 60% 1.2 0.8 0.8 2.8
gpt-4o 40% 1.0 1.2 0.2 2.4
gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18 46% 0.9 1.1 0.3 2.3

Click model rows to expand • Click test cases for detailed analysis

Failed to Load Results

An error occurred while loading the evaluation results.

Retry